Public Satisfaction Analysis toward District-Level Public Services in Semarang City

Artic Research

Public Satisfaction Analysis toward District-Level Public Services in Semarang City

Scroll Down

The Situations

Creating a Data-Driven Public Service Evaluation with BRIDA Semarang

Every year, the Government of Semarang strives to improve public service quality across districts and sub-districts. However, without a structured and reliable measurement system, understanding how citizens truly perceive these services remained a challenge. BRIDA Semarang required more than a standard satisfaction survey — they needed a comprehensive, data-driven evaluation framework that could measure performance, identify gaps, and guide policy decisions across 16 districts and 177 sub-districts.

Clients

BRIDA Semarang City

Team

Drs. Yuwanto, M.Si, P.hD.

Ayunina Zenti, S.P., M.Sc.

Arof Fuddin, S. Pd.

M. Noorman Perdana, S.Si.

Jonathan Benjamin S, S.IP.

Sofyan Setiawan, S.P., M.Sc.

Arifka Sitepu - Data Analyst

Fahmi Kurniawan - Data Analyst

Intan Nur Fadilah, S.P.

Chrisfilia Evelyn Br Damanik - Data Analyst

Arya Permana Salaka - Enumerator

Daniel Sandi Nugroho - Enumerator

Milah Hidayati - Enumerator

Swastika Ayuna Rahma - Enumerator

Izzul Muna - Enumerator

Ponco Adi Nugroho - Enumerator

Muhammad Yazid Duniam - Enumerator

Ahmad Rifan - Enumerator

Elysa Agustina Hardiyanti - Enumerator

Type

Survey, Data Analysis, Policy Insight

Creating a Data-Driven Public Service Evaluation with BRIDA Semarang
The Challenges

Evaluating Public Service Performance at Scale

1

Wide Coverage & Diverse Population

Capturing citizen feedback across 16 districts and 177 sub-districts required a structured sampling method to ensure representativeness across demographics and service experiences.

2

Multi-Dimensional Service Evaluation

Public service quality needed to be measured across multiple dimensions, including reliability, responsiveness, assurance, empathy, and tangible aspects — all with different expectations.

3

From Data to Policy Action

Transforming large-scale survey data into clear, actionable recommendations for government stakeholders was critical to ensure real impact.

Our Approach

A Structured, Data-Driven Evaluation Framework

Instead of applying a generic survey, we designed a comprehensive evaluation system combining quantitative and qualitative approaches to generate meaningful insights.

Stakeholder Alignment
01

We collaborated with BRIDA to define research objectives aligned with public service performance indicators and policy priorities.

Field Survey Deployment
02

Survey conducted across 16 districts & 177 sub-districts using structured questionnaires (IKM standard) with field validation.

Data Analysis & Measurement
03

We applied the IKM framework and SERVQUAL analysis to measure gaps between citizen expectations and actual service perception.

Insight & Reporting
04

Complex data was translated into clear performance scores, gap analysis, and strategic recommendations for policy improvement.

What We Found

Key Insights from Public Service Evaluation

From the analytics and field survey, here's what we found regarding public service performance across Semarang's districts and sub-districts:

Strength

Strength

Areas that consistently delivered high satisfaction.

  • High overall satisfaction (IKM: 88.64 – Very Good)
  • Positive perception of government staff professionalism
  • Strong foundation of public trust toward service institutions
Weakness

Weakness

Critical gaps identified in service delivery.

  • Service quality not yet fully consistent across regions
  • Gap between citizen expectations and actual service outcomes
  • Responsiveness and service experience still need improvement
Opportunities

Opportunities

High-impact areas for improvement.

  • Standardization of service quality across districts
  • Strengthening citizen-centered service design
  • Data-driven policy monitoring and evaluation systems
Threats

Threats

Risks that may affect long-term performance.

  • Variability of service quality between districts
  • Increasing public expectations toward government services
  • Limited capacity to sustain continuous improvement without structured evaluation
The Results

Measurable Impact on Public Service Evaluation

For the first time, Semarang now has a comprehensive baseline of public service performance, a data-driven understanding of citizen satisfaction, and clear direction for policy improvement and service standardization.

88.64Indeks Kepuasan Masyarakat (Kategori A – Sangat Baik)
16Districts evaluated
177Sub-districts analyzed

Ayunina Zenti, S.P., M.Sc.

Research Lead

Drs. Yuwanto, M.Si, P.hD.

Drs. Yuwanto, M.Si, P.hD.

Lead Researcher

The Results

"When we connected citizen perception with performance data, the pattern became clear: quality and consistency are the true drivers of public trust."

Watch results video
The Results

Public service performance is already strong — but consistency and quality standardization are the key to sustaining public trust.

Download PDF →

See Other Works

Public Satisfaction Analysis toward District-Level Public Services in Semarang City

Public Satisfaction Analysis toward District-Level Public Services in Semarang City

Comparative Advantage Analysis of Indonesia's Clove (Syzygium aromaticum) Export in International Market

Comparative Advantage Analysis of Indonesia's Clove (Syzygium aromaticum) Export in International Market